Women are not fit for Defense Services

Group Discussion
Points to remember before you participate in this discussion:
  • Assume you are one of the members of a real group discussion.
  • Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts.
  • Contribute your positive thoughts towards providing the solution.
  • Post your thoughts here.
Discussion:
163 comments Page 1 of 17.

Sudha said:   12 hours ago
Good evening everyone,

I am Sudha.

In my perspective, I disagree with this statement because today there are so many girls working in defence forces like the army, navy, airforce.

Those places are showing their courage, confidence, and leadership quality with pride.

So equality should focus on their mental and physical strength, not gender.

Jiya said:   1 week ago
I believe that women should be allowed in defence forces. Capabilities should be judged on basis of merit, training and discipline. Women are different physically but this is trainable with consistency and determination. Modern defence is more about leadership, strategical abilities and capability of learning new things.

Serving Nation should ne everyone's right regardless of gender. Women have prove themselves many time.

We have so many women currently serving in army, flying fighter jet and handling troops in water.

Ishita Singh said:   6 months ago
This is true that an average man is naturally physically stronger than an average woman, but on average scale only. If the woman is well-trained, then she can become strong. And if we talk about Mental strength, this is just a stereotype- a man is often taught not to cry, while women are expected to show emotions and vulnerability. If a women choose to work in defence, she should be given proper training.

Anushka Sahu said:   8 months ago
In my opinion, women are fully capable of serving in the defence forces. We should never underestimate the leadership qualities of women.
They possess courage, determination, and the ability to endure challenges without giving up.
Throughout history, many women in India have ruled kingdoms and played significant roles in revolutions, proving their strength and resilience.
Women can be strategic, disciplined, and highly motivated, which are essential qualities for defence services.
Moreover, including women in the armed forces promotes equality and brings diverse perspectives, improving teamwork and problem-solving.
Therefore, women are not only fit for defence services but can also excel in them.
(3)

RAWAT said:   1 year ago
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with women serving in defence, it's one of the best opportunities to contribute to the nation. There are different branches in the defense sector, People often think that women lack physical strength, but I believe that mental strength is far more important than physical ability. Women can choose their path based on their ambitions. Ultimately, it's not about gender; it's about serving the nation, and anyone who can contribute should have the opportunity to do so.
(10)

Akash kumar said:   2 years ago
According to me, women are not fit for defence forces because they have responsibilities for their families and children so they will not be able to manage both or not able to do both at a time.
(6)

Bharati said:   2 years ago
Hello friends, I would like to express my view on this topic.

According to me, Women are fit for roles in defence forces. Yes, maybe in terms of physical strength men maybe strong, but we have many examples were women in defence forces like airforce, navy, army have led examples and served the country. If they are able to pass test given by defence head successfully then they must be allowed. Both men and women are officers and gender should not be an obstacle to serve the country.
(6)

Neetu said:   3 years ago
Good evening. Friends.

Today we are juncture here to discuss a serious topic women in the armed forces so now I am telling you about my views on it.

All we know for defence technical services there has no single doubt that women are equal to men mentally.

According to me, who are strong enough to fight with men so if girls do everything like playing outdoor games with boys and practice with them they surely will be able to get that fitness that men have so it depends on them if they want to do what they can do.

If they were given training like you guys then definitely they will able to manage their physical strength.

The problem is within our minds and in our way of thinking because if a woman can take care of a family why can't she take care of a country?

If they wanna be a soldier or a wrestler just support them.

That's all.

Thanks.
(28)

R.R.Parashar said:   5 years ago
Most of women are emotionally connect to their family and give it priority. You need to sacrifice your emotion to serve the country better with priority or believe that's whole your country is your family and you will strongly never comparison between them.
(66)

Ked brt said:   5 years ago
On a candor note, one may think that women are not fit the military but we cannot simply assume it without looking at some facts, to begin with men or boys are actually are stronger than women ie the upper body strength in a male is 55% more than a female and 27% more strength in the male low body (which is a SCIENTIFIC fact that's been proven over and over, however, there may be some exceptions).

Furthermore, the military has standards which everyone needs to meet (men and women both) in order to enlist or to make it to field combat duty, which begins at the basic training boot camp, with a series of obstacles and a bare minimum required to pass, over the years almost all of the men were able to pass the minimum while the majority of the women were not able to, this escalated into blaming the military that the basic training obstacles are difficult for women and are keeping them from perusing their military carriers, that the bare minimum was lowered for them so that they could pass, which still wasn\'t a bright idea since even then a good number of women still failed.

Adding to that United States Marine Corps study experiment conducted proved that compared to female units, the all-male units had a noticeable difference in their performance they were faster in each tactical movement, had better accuracy, were quicker to register more hits on target, and were able to overcome obstacles and evacuate casualties without any difficulty, with women who are the above-average performing females were only equal to the average performing males (However this can vary from individual to Individual) That being said, Yes! women have to be allowed in military positions. HR, telecommunication officers, radar operators, technical services etc are great for women (also same for some men). However, almost all men in basic training were good at essential jobs which require peak physical strength, endurance, speed, agility in order not to jeopardize other unit members with subpar performance, because life literally hangs in the balance so be it a man or a woman if they can carry a 6 foot 200 pound wounded grunt with an additional 80-pound gear while taking enemy fire, and being able to fight off in a hand to hand combat against a trained enemy killer who won't discriminate against gender then whoever, man or women that can meet this standard are most welcomed to the front lines.

But otherwise having women in the military with lowered standards is a hyper hazard and the delusional feministic indoctrination will end up putting soldiers in body bags.
(38)


Post your thoughts here:

Your comments will be displayed after verification.